I clearly believe a lot more than some of my coalition colleagues - Tories - in redistribution and using the tax system for that purpose. I also believe in the government having an active role in the economy which is having an industrial strategy. I'm not a believer in laissez-faire.
We say to the British government: you have kept those sculptures for almost two centuries. You have cared for them as well as you could for which we thank you. But now in the name of fairness and morality please give them back.
We have to attack those things which stand in the way of America progress. And what stands in the way of American progress right now is the federal government.
The government of Israel doesn't like the kinds of things I say which puts them into the same category as every other government in the world.
To Republicans I humbly suggest that we make it possible for Democrats to give up their quest for redistribution of income and wealth by our acceptance of an appropriate role for government in financing those public goods and services necessary to secure a social safety net below which no American would be allowed to fall.
In government offices which are sensitive to the vehemence and passion of mass sentiment public men have no sure tenure. They are in effect perpetual office seekers always on trial for their political lives always required to court their restless constituents.
There is a Western world. There is America. There is Great Britain and Germany and France and Russia and China and other nations. I doubt that there is one country amongst those I mentioned which has a desire to see Iran with its fundamentalist Islamic extremist government possessing nuclear weapons.
No more distressing moment can ever face a British government than that which requires it to come to a hard fast and specific decision.
We must make it an imperative duty of our government to protect the gifts which Nature has bestowed on America and to insure the maintenance of a clean healthy wholesome environment for our people.
While approximately one in every 400 children and adolescents have Type I diabetes recent Government reports indicate that one in every three children born in 2000 will suffer from obesity which as noted is a predominant Type II precursor.
Nothing is so galling to a people not broken in from the birth as a paternal or in other words a meddling government a government which tells them what to read and say and eat and drink and wear.
You can't have a situation in which companies proceed on a permanent basis relying only on cash from the government.
First of all I can't forget my first responsibility - which is to be the Leader of the Opposition and that's to provide an alternative government.
Where there is little or no public opinion there is likely to be bad government which sooner or later becomes autocratic government.
I've been in and out of Wall Street since 1949 and I've never seen the type of animosity between government and Wall Street. And I'm not sure where it comes from but I suspect it's got to do with a general schism in this society which is really becoming ever more destructive.
Television of course actually started in Britain in 1936 and it was a monopoly and there was only one broadcaster and it operated on a license which is not the same as a government grant.
I really do inhabit a system in which words are capable of shaking the entire structure of government where words can prove mightier than ten military divisions.
Of the various forms of government which have prevailed in the world an hereditary monarchy seems to present the fairest scope for ridicule.
It is perfectly true that that government is best which governs least. It is equally true that that government is best which provides most.
I cannot think of any circumstances in which a government can go to war without the support of parliament.
The three great ends which a statesman ought to propose to himself in the government of a nation are one Security to possessors two facility to acquirers and three hope to all.
A world in which government is burdened by historic debt philanthropy has limited resources and the private sector is only interested in its own personal gain is simply unsustainable.
If the jury have no right to judge of the justice of a law of the government they plainly can do nothing to protect the people against the oppressions of the government for there are no oppressions which the government may not authorize by law.
In my view the Christian religion is the most important and one of the first things in which all children under a free government ought to be instructed.