I am for a clear distinction between public and private life. I believe private matters should be regulated in private and I have asked those close to me to respect this.
Today's consumers are eager to become loyal fans of companies that respect purposeful capitalism. They are not opposed to companies making a profit indeed they may even be investors in these companies - but at the core they want more empathic enlightened corporations that seek a balance between profit and purpose.
They become the keepers of the mystery. They place themselves between the communicants of the religion and the immediate experience. And then they dictate the terms on which you can have contact with this wonderful mystery. We don't dictate those terms.
I am a person whose father had no religion but who went to the nuns for a couple of years. And I think I'm the same: On one hand I pray on the other hand I don't believe. I am constantly between the two.
We are so accustomed to think of religion as a thing between individual men and God that we can hardly enter into the idea of a religion in which a whole nation in its national organisation appears as the religious unit.
I have a certain pool of subject matter that I like to write about things that interest me: politics religion ecology and relationships between men and women. And that's usually what I focus on.
Art and Religion are then two roads by which men escape from circumstance to ecstasy. Between aesthetic and religious rapture there is a family alliance. Art and Religion are means to similar states of mind.
I think there's been a big problem between religion or organized religion and spirituality.
I think there's a difference between God and religion.
There can be no truce between science and religion.
There is all the difference in the world between teaching children about religion and handing them over to be taught by the religious.
I also like to look at the dynamic that takes place between religion and science because in a way both are asking the same questions: Who are we? Where do we come from? Why are we here? Where are we going? The methodologies are diametrically opposed but their motivation is the same the wellspring is the same in both cases.
There is a very intimate connection between hypnotic phenomena and religion.
The difference between religion and morality lies simply in the classical division of things into the divine and the human if one only interprets this correctly.
There was no division I could see between the essential teaching of all Prophets and wise men of religion.
Personally I don't choose any particular religion or symbol or group of words or teachings to define me. That's between me and the most high. You know my higher self. The Creator.
If your religion doesn't teach you the difference between good and evil your religion is worse than useless.
The difference between a saint and a hypocrite is that one lies for his religion the other by it.
I'm sickened by all religions. Religion has divided people. I don't think there's any difference between the pope wearing a large hat and parading around with a smoking purse and an African painting his face white and praying to a rock.
Let me say this loud and clear. There is a world of difference between terrorist acts and the Islamic Shari'a. Islam is not only a religion but a way of life. And at its heart lie the sacred principles of tolerance and dialogue.
One's own religion is after all a matter between oneself and one's Maker and no one else's.
I feel an intense intimacy with those who have this loathing interest in me. Further than this I know what they mean I sympathize with them I understand them. There should be a name (as poetic as love) for this relationship between loather and loathed it is of the closest and more full of passion than incest.
The relationship between press and politician - protected by the Constitution and designed to be happily adversarial - becomes sour raw and confrontational.
I think I learned about the relationship between books and life from Margaret Mitchell.